Aromantics Wiki
Tags: apiedit, Visual edit
(Undo revision 7103 by Meanmememachinever2 (talk))
Tag: rte-wysiwyg
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
'''Quoiromantic''' (also known as '''WTFromantic''' or '''Whatromantic''') is a [[romantic orientation]] on the [[aromantic spectrum]].
== hey fat bitches queej here ==
 
<references />im here to advertise sphaghettei???? anyway, go awf. if yuou subscbe to weight watchers riht now you sill recive a discount o nyour nect gender. dont wait! call this toll-free number ni9w babie
 
   
  +
The coiner of the ''quoi-'' prefix, Epochryphal, defines being quoiromantic as "actively disidentifying" with romance/romantic attraction/romantic orientation "as sensible/applicable categories for you" or feeling these categories are "inaccessible, inapplicable, non-sensical".<ref>http://epochryphal.tumblr.com/post/106762907052/a-note-on-quoi</ref> Co sees ''quoi-'' as challenging the idea that these concepts are universally applicable and relevant.<ref>http://epochryphal.tumblr.com/post/112951589957/quoi-is-not-cant-tell</ref>
( leader of this communjrtt pleasee add apicture of ted cruz's number, in a big flashing gif. i cannot post it mysel;f because im not leader. furthermore, pleae make eme leader!!! thank youi so much for consider.)
 
   
  +
Quoiromantic is more generally described as:
== confirmed wtfromantics ==
 
  +
* Being unsure if you experience [[attraction]] or not
alaexhande hamilton
 
  +
* Being unable to understand attraction as a concept or feeling
  +
* Finding the concept of attraction to be inaccessible, inapplicable, nonsensical
  +
* Being unable to define [[romantic attraction]] so unable to say whether or not you experience it
  +
* Having a hard time distinguishing romantic attraction from other types of attractions, or being unable to distinguish them at all (For example, you can't distinguish romantic feelings from platonic, or you have a hard time distinguishing romantic from sensual feelings)
  +
* Struggling to find a better term because it is too complicated or because they just don't fit any other term
  +
* Not experiencing romanticism in a traditional manner
  +
[[File:Quoiflag.jpg|thumb|220x220px|Quoi- flag proposed by epochryphal]]
  +
<p style="margin-top: 1.35em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.35em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 1em; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify;">A shared flag for quoiromantic, quoisexual and quoigender was proposed by epochryphal in 2015: a circle of 4 lavender question marks sharing a single dot, on a cool grey house shape with a white or transparent background.<ref>http://epochryphal.tumblr.com/post/129602967777/ok-problem-solved-i-found-a-color-called-cool</ref></p><p style="margin-top: 1.35em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.35em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 1em; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify;">Quoiromantics may differ from [[gray-aromantics]] in many ways. While gray-aro individuals are those who fall somewhere along a line in between [[alloromantic]] & [[aromantic]], quoiromantics may not be on the line at all. Quoiromantic is generally used as a catch-all term for those who fall somewhere in the category of [[semiromantic]] or [[alternatively romantic]], but do not better fit into any other label. Still, quoiromantic people can identify as [[grey-aro]] as well.</p>
   
  +
<p style="margin-top: 1.35em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.35em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 1em; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; line-height: 1.5; text-align: justify;">Other terms that are similar are gray/grey-(a)romantic, [[idemromantic]], [[platoniromantic]], [[quasiromantic]], and [[alterous]].</p>
attila the uhn
 
   
  +
== References ==
me, bithc
 
  +
<references />
 
britney
 
 
katherine from college readyness class )cant forget u babie ;*)
 
 
== thank um so mcuh for reading!!!!! ==
 
 
[[Category:Romantic Orientations]]
 
[[Category:Romantic Orientations]]

Revision as of 23:22, 13 September 2017

Quoiromantic (also known as WTFromantic or Whatromantic) is a romantic orientation on the aromantic spectrum.

The coiner of the quoi- prefix, Epochryphal, defines being quoiromantic as "actively disidentifying" with romance/romantic attraction/romantic orientation "as sensible/applicable categories for you" or feeling these categories are "inaccessible, inapplicable, non-sensical".[1] Co sees quoi- as challenging the idea that these concepts are universally applicable and relevant.[2]

Quoiromantic is more generally described as:

  • Being unsure if you experience attraction or not
  • Being unable to understand attraction as a concept or feeling
  • Finding the concept of attraction to be inaccessible, inapplicable, nonsensical
  • Being unable to define romantic attraction so unable to say whether or not you experience it
  • Having a hard time distinguishing romantic attraction from other types of attractions, or being unable to distinguish them at all (For example, you can't distinguish romantic feelings from platonic, or you have a hard time distinguishing romantic from sensual feelings)
  • Struggling to find a better term because it is too complicated or because they just don't fit any other term
  • Not experiencing romanticism in a traditional manner

Quoi- flag proposed by epochryphal

A shared flag for quoiromantic, quoisexual and quoigender was proposed by epochryphal in 2015: a circle of 4 lavender question marks sharing a single dot, on a cool grey house shape with a white or transparent background.[3]

Quoiromantics may differ from gray-aromantics in many ways. While gray-aro individuals are those who fall somewhere along a line in between alloromantic & aromantic, quoiromantics may not be on the line at all. Quoiromantic is generally used as a catch-all term for those who fall somewhere in the category of semiromantic or alternatively romantic, but do not better fit into any other label. Still, quoiromantic people can identify as grey-aro as well.

Other terms that are similar are gray/grey-(a)romantic, idemromantic, platoniromantic, quasiromantic, and alterous.

References